AI was supposed to make multilingual content production easier. In practice, many teams are seeing something else: more output to review, more back-and-forth, more uncertainty about quality, and often more coordination than before. That is where AI fatigue in localization begins. It is not only about cultural resistance or general weariness with new technology. In […]
Read the article
Generative AI is impressive for its speed, fluency, and ability to produce text at scale. But localization makes it very clear where that promise starts to break down. Why? Because localization is not just about converting words from one language into another. It requires teams to interpret intent, handle implication, account for product context, culture, […]
Read the article
In many organizations, post-editing is still the main point of contact between people and an AI-assisted translation or multilingual content generation system. It is useful, but it is not enough. If human corrections are used only to deliver acceptable content faster, you improve a deliverable. If those corrections are captured, categorized, fed back into the […]
Read the article
The English edition of my book is now available. It is called Linguistic Localization: From Chaos to Strategy and, although it clearly grew out of the original French book, I do not consider it a simple translation. When I started working on the English edition, I could have taken the original text chapter by chapter […]
Read the article
When teams talk about localization, many still think in terms of text volume. The longer the content, the more strategic it seems. By contrast, a three-word UI string can look minor, almost administrative. That is a common mistake. In digital products, the shortest pieces of content often carry the most critical decisions: click, confirm, cancel, […]
Read the article
AI has changed the conversation around localization. The question is no longer simply should you use it? but under what conditions does it actually deliver quality? Many teams start by comparing models, prompts, or expected productivity gains. That is useful, but it is not the right starting point. In practice, the real prerequisite for AI […]
Read the article
When a multilingual AI pilot underperforms, the first instinct is often to blame the model, the prompt, or the output quality. In many cases, though, the real issue starts much earlier: with how the content itself was prepared. AI does not compensate for poorly prepared content. It does not automatically fix unstable terminology, inconsistent structure, […]
Read the article
Choosing a first AI use case in localization is often harder than choosing the tool itself. Many teams start too small, running a test with little real impact. Others start too big, with a scope that is too exposed, too complex, or too sensitive. In both cases, the pilot produces limited insight. It does not […]
Read the article
A multilingual AI proof of concept rarely fails because the model cannot generate text. More often, it fails because the company is measuring the wrong things. If you only track generation speed, cost per word, or a few “before and after” examples, you end up with a showcase, not a decision framework. A serious POC […]
Read the article
Most AI pilots do not fail because the model itself “doesn’t work.” More often, they fail because the workflow is not designed to absorb the real risks of production: inconsistent quality, weak governance, no escalation rules, unclear approvals, and no mechanism for turning edits into learning. That is what real AI maturity looks like. It […]
Read the article
One of the most common misunderstandings about AI in localization is simple: if the text sounds more natural, human effort must go down. In practice, it is not that straightforward. Yes, generative models often produce more fluent output than older systems. Yes, they can speed up part of the production process. But that fluency creates […]
Read the article
For a long time, linguistic quality was treated as a final verification step. Teams created content, translated it, and then reviewed it before publishing. That model could work in slower production cycles, with limited volumes and relatively stable deliverables. That is no longer the reality. Today, teams manage serial, multimodal, and continuously updated content: product […]
Read the articleNext step
Let’s discuss your context, priorities, and the next useful decision.
